看板 FB_doc 關於我們 聯絡資訊
--sA0T44BA86podSFD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 02:48:02PM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote: > Marc Fonvieille wrote: > >On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 01:20:37PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: > > > >>[ Moved to doc@ from some other place ] > >> > >>On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 05:58:37AM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Or perhaps > >>>4.X will be knifed from the handbook. And most likely, the > >>>only people who will expect it coming will be those that aren't > >>>going to stand in my way.[1] :) > >>> > >>>[1]: Please don't take that as if it's rude, I'm actually > >>> joking around with it. Cause I know that if someone > >>> tried that, well, to core && doceng they'd be explaining. > >> > >>Actually that's a great idea. There's no reason why we couldn't, like > >>today, commit a copy of the current handbook to handbook4 and then get > >>rid of all the crud from the real handbook. Same deal with the FAQ. > >>The information is still available then, but we no longer have to tear > >>our own hair own trying to maintain the documents. > >> > > > > > >If people agree with that idea, let's freeze a Handbook4 and stop > >"supporting" 4.X in docs. (By "freeze" I mean no any new > >addition/change beside typos.) Let's then create a HANDBOOK_4 (or > >something like that) tag for CVSup operations. > >We could do the same for Handbook5 when 5.X will be dropped. > >Well, we could do the same as the Security Officer and set up a schedule > >for releases Handbook/docs support; this schedule will allow us to know > >when a HandbookX freeze will happen. > > > >Marc >=20 > I am very much in favor of this idea. Though, should we really tag=20 > another branch? We recently branched the documentation for RELENG6 > so we might want to just use that? instead of duplicating that > information. On the other hand, a nice schedule and the availability > of 'old' unused branches is also very nice. I guess that this really would count as "sweeping", which means that we'll have to wait a week or two. At least that allows us plenty of time to finalise the plans. The important points are: i) Handbook-4 must still be available on the website, probably via the URL /doc/<lang>/handbook4/; ii) We must be able to rip out all the [1-4].x information that is in our way from the current handbook. To me, that means: i) Laying down a (PRE_)HANDBOOK4 CVS tag; ii) Repocopying doc/<lang>/books/handbook to doc/<lang>/books/handbook4 for each language; iii) Perhaps throwing the build of that directory under a (defaulted to off) knob (that the web build can turn on). where bits in parentheses may or may not make sense. There's no reason not to lay down a new tag, especially now. If this becomes part of the release cycle proper then we could omit it then, but it's too late now for 6. Ceri --=20 Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Einstein (attrib.) --sA0T44BA86podSFD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDUP34ocfcwTS3JF8RAuPBAKDHhxR7O64iDcaYfu4OJQpCcdQhSQCghyfK xmpARnTNnUHlSkby7MGgeDk= =jIOI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sA0T44BA86podSFD--