The following reply was made to PR docs/93764; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>
To: Daniel Gerzo <danger@rulez.sk>,
<FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: docs/93764: [patch] addition to firewalls section - ipfw
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:52:24 +0000
On 23/2/06 19:16, "Daniel Gerzo" <danger@rulez.sk> wrote:
Daniel,
Welcome to your first proper review by me. We hope that you don't squirm
too much. :)
> @@ -2283,7 +2283,50 @@
>
> <para>Set the script to run to activate your rules:</para>
>
> - <programlisting>firewall_script="/etc/ipfw.rules"</programlisting>
> + <programlisting>firewall_script="/etc/rc.firewall"</programlisting>
That's the default, so perhaps we can get away with not specifying this all.
> +
> + <para>Set the type of firewall. This enables a simple pre-set
> + ruleset for <application>IPFW</application>:</para>
> +
> + <programlisting>firewall_type="open"</programlisting>
> +
> + <para>Available values for this setting are:</para>
This is the handbook. We can get away with an actual paragraph explaining
this pre-set ruleset thing. I think that the above is too brief and
presupposes that I know what you're saying already.
> + <itemizedlist>
> + <listitem>
> + <para><literal>open</literal> — allow anyone in.</para>
> + </listitem>
That text isn't good. "Pass all traffic" perhaps?
> + <listitem>
> + <para><literal>client</literal> — will protect only this
> + machine.</para>
> + </listitem>
> + <listitem>
> + <para><literal>simple</literal> — protect the whole
> + network.</para>
Do what now? So I can run this on a FreeBSD machine and do without a
firewall? Sweet! Seriously though, "protect the whole network" is
misleading in the absence of context.
> + </listitem>
> + <listitem>
> + <para><literal>closed</literal> — entirely disables IP
> + services except via lo0 interface.</para>
s/services/traffic/, s/via/via the/
> + </listitem>
> + <listitem>
> + <para><literal>UNKNOWN</literal> — disables the loading
> + of firewall rules.</para>
> + </listitem>
> + <listitem>
> + <para><replaceable>filename</replaceable> — will load the rules
> + in the given filename (full path required).</para>
s/full/absolute/
> + </listitem>
> + </itemizedlist>
> +
> + <note>
> + <para>If <literal>firewall_type</literal> is set either to
> + <literal>client</literal> or <literal>simple</literal>, the
> + default rules found in <filename>/etc/rc.firewall</filename>
> + should be reviewed to fit to the setup of the given machine.
Try to avoid the word "setup" if you can. Try one of "purpose",
"configuration", "services", "function", etc.
> + Also note, that the examples used in this chapter expect that
That comma doesn't belong there.
> + the <literal>firewall_type</literal> is set to
> + <filename>/etc/ipfw.rules</filename>.</para>
> + </note>
Ceri
--
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-- Moliere
_______________________________________________
freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"