Re: Fix for ithread.9

Tom Rhodes wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:05:04 +0200
> Pav Lucistnik <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> Devon H. O'Dell p竁e v p25. 08. 2006 v 13:37 -0400:
>>
>>> I was discussing UMA with Robert Watson yesterday; specifically its 
>>> usage implications in an interrupt context. He suggested adding some 
>>> information to ithread(9) specifying semantics for memory allocation in 
>>> an interrupt context. So I came up with this tiny patch, shot it jhb@'s 
>>> way, he reviewed it and told me to shoot it this way.
>>>
>>> So here it is, apparently ready to be committed.
>> Applied, thanks!
> 
> After you fixed the hard sentence break issue, right Pav?  ;)

?

I don't see a hard sentence break in my patch or the commit.

--dho
_______________________________________________
[e-mail] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[e-mail]"