--Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 12:02:00AM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote:
> Daniel Gerzo wrote:
> >Hello Remko,
> >
> >Friday, October 13, 2006, 11:30:21 AM, you wrote:
> >
> >>Synopsis: Wrong documentation of /etc/ftpchroot
> >
> >>State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> >>State-Changed-By: remko
> >>State-Changed-When: Fri Oct 13 09:29:48 UTC 2006
> >>State-Changed-Why:=20
> >>I believe this was fixed with the latest import of lukemftpd
> >>please report to me when I thought that incorrectly (checked
> >>the manual pages so it -should- be fixed).
> >
> >It wasn't actually :/
> >The ftpd's and lukemftpd's manual pages still conflict pretty badly.
> >
>=20
> Hey Daniel,
>=20
> Care to explain what still conflicts then? I checked the ftpchroot
> information and that is well explained now, which was the reason
> of the PR...
ftpchroot(5) claims to be the manpage for ftpd(8). It isn't. It's a
manpage that comes with lukemftpd(8). Coincidentally, it seems somewhat
correct (it looks like the lukemftpd use of ftpusers changed to match
ours?). However, it also states:
If the ftpusers file does not exist, all users are denied access.
which is not true of ftpd(8).
I have not verified that the ftpchroot syntax is the same for both
ftpd(8) and lukemftpd(8).
Ceri
--=20
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-- Moliere
--Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFFNS76ocfcwTS3JF8RAjx4AKC5V6udZ2XCxHnmDhxAn+llJxl6KwCbBAhz
Q1wovVQc08oUA9hZiNSdwOU=
=HL4R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU--