Cristian KLEIN wrote:
> I haven't really understood your question, but I hope the following info
> will answer it.
>
> Originally, ipfw requires netif, while ipf is before netif. This places
> ipfw explicitly after ipf. I honestly have absolutely no idea why the
> dependencies are like this.
This would be a good issue to bring up on freebsd-rc@.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
_______________________________________________
freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"