看板 FB_doc 關於我們 聯絡資訊
On Sunday 21 January 2007 16:24, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 01:48:14PM -0800, Murray Stokely wrote: > > On 1/18/07, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > > =================================================================== > > >- { " sys", "/usr/src/sys (FreeBSD kernel)", > > >+ { " sys", "/usr/src/sys (FreeBSD kernel; requires > > >'base' > > >to build)", > > > > I think this is a good solution. > > > I don't think this is a good idea as it's not actually required. > The sys/ part have traditionally been standalone. And if you're > not upgrading then "buildkernel" is just a convenience alias for > config/make method. Actually this method is always used except > that in the buildkernel case it will use an upgraded toolchain > if it was previously built by "buildworld". It is required for buildkernel as otherwise there's no Makefile in /usr/src with a buildkernel target. It's only not required if you do 'config, etc.' by hand, but 'make buildkernel' requires some sort of /usr/src/Makefile, obviously. :) -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"