Re: make buildkernel fails without complete source tree

--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 02:01:38PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> True.  I guess this is sort of where I was headed.  IMHO we should
> either leave it as-is for the traditionalists or we should bite the
> bullet and stop providing a separate kernel source tree.  As John
> pointed out in the message after this one life has moved on and
> now /usr/src is teeny compared to the size of disks.  Is it worth the
> hassle/confusion to provide just kernel source any more?
>=20
Thinking of embedded world, it still makes a lot of sense.
I think adding a note to Handbook would be a good solution.


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov
[e-mail]
FreeBSD committer

--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFtQwGqRfpzJluFF4RAiLQAKCJWpoFnlr9KSyyX8k/dFwwTT4omgCgmMw8
m2UGLXqhOlfsbB/Rc1D+PmY=
=T3k1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--