Re: make buildkernel fails without complete source tree

Ken Smith wrote:
> IMHO we should
> either leave it as-is for the traditionalists or we should bite the
> bullet and stop providing a separate kernel source tree.  As John
> pointed out in the message after this one life has moved on and
> now /usr/src is teeny compared to the size of disks.  Is it worth the
> hassle/confusion to provide just kernel source any more?

I personally don't think so, but I didn't want to suggest anything so
revolutionary. :)

Doug

-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection
_______________________________________________
[e-mail] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[e-mail]"