看板 FB_doc 關於我們 聯絡資訊
On 2008-01-14 21:54, gregoryd.freebsd@free.fr wrote: > Quoting keramida@FreeBSD.org: > > - <para>You should also specify the <literal>rw</literal> capability; > > - that tells <application>LPD</application> to open the printer in > > - read-write mode.</para> > > + <para>You should also specify the <literal>rw</literal> capability. > > + When this capability is present, <application>LPD</application> > > + opens the printer in read-write mode.</para> > > > > Does this look better? > > I guess we should avoid the repetition of "capability", though (the fdp-primer, > "writing style" invites us to). > What do you think of something like: " When present, it tells LPD to open the > printer in r/w mode". > My, I'm starting to feel like a fussy guy, now... :-\ "When present, it tells LPD to..." has two minor nits which I don't really like a lot: * It lacks a subject for "present". When "what" is present? * It uses "it" to refer to the non-existent subject. I'm not sure if this rewrite is better, but I'm certainly open to more suggestions. _______________________________________________ freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"