看板 FB_doc 關於我們 聯絡資訊
On 2008-01-14 18:48, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Daniel Gerzo wrote: >> Tuesday, January 15, 2008, 12:02:32 AM, Warren Block wrote: >>> <para>You should also include the <literal>rw</literal> capability >>> so <application>LPD</application> opens the printer in read-write >>> mode. >> >> Maybe something like: >> >> <para>The <literal>rw</literal> capability should be also included in >> order to let <application>LPD</application> to open the printer in >> the read-write mode.</para> > > That's a little passive, although I agree with removing "you should". > Let's make it imperative: > > <para>Include the <literal>rw</literal> capability so > <application>LPD</application> will open the printer in read-write > mode. That sounds cool. Can I commit this version? I think we have spent enough time tinkering with a little sentence already. It would be far more productive if we wrote even _more_ documentation :) _______________________________________________ freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"