On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 12:50:53PM +0300, Anatolij Shkodin wrote:
> FreeBSD handbook section:
> 6.2.4 Firefox, Mozilla and Macromedia긠Flash??? plugin
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/desktop-browsers.html
>
> -----
>
> I think the section might be old. It is possible to install the
> www/linux-flashplugin9 port (instead of www/linux-flashplugin7) by using
> nspluginwrapper, following the instructions provided at
>
but does it works? I mean: is the linux-flashplugin9 stable? I read
many things about the fact people should stick to linux-flashplugin7.
> http://www.erikd.se/freebsd/freebsd-flash-in-firefox/
>
This document is about linux-flashplugin7 not linux-flashplugin9.
To sum up: it's Ok to change the current doc for www/nspluginwrapper
since this one can be used under both i386/amd64 arch. But regarding
the flashplugin version, the linux-flashplugin7 is known to be stable
(most of time) but I'm not sure the same can be said for
linux-flashplugin9.
--
Marc
_______________________________________________
freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"