Ivan Voras wrote:
> Benjie Chen wrote:
>
>> Kernel panic is at 0xC066C731, which from nm shows it's in mtx_lock_spin
>> c066c7b4 T _mtx_lock_spin
>> c066c85c T _mtx_unlock_sleep
>>
>> So this could mean that independent stress tests will not result in
>> panic if
>> there aren't enough concurrency to cause the problem.
>
> When you get a kernelbacktrace, see if it's the same as the one
> mentioned here:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-September/076932.html
Surely it cannot be since it involves a different function ;-)
Kris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"