Re: A TrustedBSD "voluntary sandbox" policy.

On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Andrea Campi wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:20:28PM -0500, [e-mail] wrote:
>
>> I'm considering developing a policy/module for TrustedBSD loosely based on 
>> the systrace concept - A process loads a policy and then executes another 
>> program in a sandbox with fine grained control over what that program can 
>> do.
> ...
>> Please note that the 'policy' given on the command line is purely for the 
>> sake of example, no syntax or semantics have been decided upon.
>
> Can't comment on the implementation or wider issues, but if you pursue this, 
> please have a look at how MacOS Leopard does it (Seatbelt). Would be nice to 
> converge on both syntax (a Schema dialect) and tools names / command line 
> args--or if converging is not possible, at least know where and why and make 
> a conscious decision.

FYI, Seatbelt is based on the Mac OS X port of the TrustedBSD MAC Framework, 
which while it has some significant changes (some now present in the 8-CURRENT 
branch of FreeBSD), may well be a good starting point.  Last I checked, the 
source for Seatbelt wasn't yet available, but there was hope it would be 
available in the near future.  A port of the policy to FreeBSD sounds like it 
would be very interesting to do, and might provide a nice starting point 
rather than having to write up a policy from scratch.

Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge
_______________________________________________
[e-mail] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[e-mail]"