看板 FB_hackers 關於我們 聯絡資訊
--Op27XXJsWz80g3oF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 01:58:32PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: >booting. If I stick "-v" in /boot.config, then when the kernel probes, all >the probes are verbose. Stuff like my HDaudio card print incredibly >verbose listings. OK, that's what I will call here Print#1 > >The other thing is what I can see if I see the ascii-graphical loader (the >picture, in ascii-graphics, either of a BSDaemon, or of the letters >"FreeBSD", and a list of about 9 options for booting. If I select item #5, >then I get a listing. The listing is quite distinct from what I identify >as Print#1, so I'll call this Print#2. If I either hit return at that There are no distinct names for what you call Print#1 and Print#2 because these outputs should be identical. Within the kernel, the verbosity is controlled by a boolean flag "bootverbose" - which is visible via sysctl as "debug.bootverbose". What differences are you seeing between the two outputs? What is the content of your /boot.config and /boot/loader.conf (and any other files you have changed in /boot)? Can you please provide the output from "sysctl debug.boothowto" and "kenv" in the the above two cases as well as a default boot. I presume you aren't seeing any of this odd behaviour when you boot =66rom an install CD. It would really help if you reverted back to a stock GENERIC kernel, with no local mods in / or /boot and then started re-applying your changes one at a time to see what has gone wrong. >I'm beginning, right now, to wonder: I increased the dmesg-buffer to 64K, I >wonder if maybe that might possibly cause the bug? I know it shouldn't, >but it wouldn't be the first time this week that I found weird behaviour in >the kernel: if you set the number of vtys from the default 16 down to 8, >that caused me to lose keyboard input to my X11. None of this should happen either. --=20 Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. --Op27XXJsWz80g3oF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHdrzg/opHv/APuIcRAiHmAJ9kayXUg5sUgSibFqVIbW6jBjrCkwCgwUS2 vP89fmUedb0y12CttU5aOAg= =oa2D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Op27XXJsWz80g3oF--