看板 FB_hackers 關於我們 聯絡資訊
Hi, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: > Stefan Lambrev <stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com> writes: > =20 >> I tested all different combination. The performance change is almost >> invisible (100-200KB/s), and can't be compared with the performance >> boost that TSC gain over ACPI-fast timecounter. Unfortunately TSC >> doesn't play nice with power saving modes. >> =20 > > This will vary greatly from machine to machine, depending on the exact > hardware and the ACPI BIOS. > > More modern machines have an HPET timer which is supposedly faster than= > ACPI yet more reliable than TSC. > > DES > =20 I do not have HEPT on the servers that I test, but simple test on my=20 laptop shows that hping can generate with ACPI-fast ~4MB/s traffic, 5MB/s with HPET and 8MB/s with TSC. I didn't check dummy time counter. Also I noticed that there is a kern.timecounter.tc.XXX.quality (read only= ). Can this be used to reduce quality and speed up performance? --=20 Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"