"william wong" <beijing.liangjie@gmail.com> writes:
> Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes:
> > "william wong" <beijing.liangjie@gmail.com> writes:
> > > It seems that Juniper favors the even number FreeBSD's.
> > Only because 5 was a dog. They probably stuck with 4 for a while, then
> > switched to 6 once they had ascertained that it was significantly more
> > stable than 5. I would be surprised if they skipped 7.
> Please pardon my ignorance of the jargons. Does that mean 5 is not
> stable or does not perform or what?
FreeBSD 5 was not a very good series. It was released late and had
issues with both stability and performance. FreeBSD 6 corrected the
stability issues and some of the worst performance issues. FreeBSD 7
took care of the remaining performance issues; it may not be as fast as
4 was on UP, but it beats Linux on SMP.
(there's no point in comparing SMP performance between 4 and 7 since 4
had a single-threaded kernel and practically no userland thread support)
DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"