--3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 07:39:27AM +0100, Volker wrote:
> While working through the PR backlog, I found two PRs filed containing
> source code for two tools (decomment, relpath) under the Apple Public
> Source License (APSL).
>=20
> I think these tools aren't that bad but before pinging any committer
> with that, I thought I might throw the question on the table: What
> about importing code under the APSL license? Has there been any
> consensus in the past about that license?
>=20
> I'm not a lawyer but the license seems to be reasonable suited for the
> BSD projects.
>=20
> PRs in question: bin/67307 bin/67308
The quotes on the followup are essentially correct except that explicit
approval is required by core to add new Non-BSD-Licensed code and
that there would need to be a mechanism to not build them as part of
buildworld to allow environments that do not want to deal with the APSL
to avoid it similar to GPL or CDDL code.
-- Brooks
--3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFHtFe9XY6L6fI4GtQRAlVJAJ4sBR9SrbPruCc0+ouy1iYDRbSvfwCdG/3T
TTpxvM/4HAsehAWroyPtSjw=
=gyDi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ--