--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 08:47:02PM +0100, Volker wrote:
> On 02/14/08 20:17, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > APSL is not generally accepted in the base. It may be acceptable in
> > certain circumstances, but strong technical justification is generally
> > required for inclusion.
>=20
> Brooks,
>=20
> so better put that into the ports tree?
It could go into ports without issue. If it's functionality people
need in the base then perhaps a case could be made, but at a glance it
doesn't look like these really qualify.
-- Brooks
--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFHtJ2NXY6L6fI4GtQRAoyKAKC9JfGaABQhVj7lq+fiHmrdMLFhlwCdH+m0
VVL9AxX3SeVvuoJlEsqBpNU=
=rXX0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--