Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Finally, the way vkernels were implemented in dragonfly was *very*
> :disruptive to the kernel source (lots of function renaming etc), so it
> :is likely that this would also have to be completely reimplemented in a
> :FreeBSD port.
> :...
> :Kris
>
> Well, I don't think I would agree with your assessment but,
> particularly, the way vkernels are implemented in DragonFly is NOT
> in the least disruptive to kernel source.
I was referring to the decision you made to rename all of the kernel
functions that conflicted with libc functions so that vkernels could be
linked against libc.
Kris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"