看板 FB_hackers 關於我們 聯絡資訊
Jason Hellenthal wrote: > Legacy . . . > /adjective/ > COMPUTING > ** > > 1. > *1*. > denoting software or hardware that has been superseded but is > difficult to replace because of its wide use. > > > What about that says unsupported ? Sure, you're right about the dictionary definition, but in some usage (including among certain folks who build, package and use a popular open-source alternative to FreeBSD), people treat the word "legacy" as synonymous with "obsolete". Perhaps they shouldn't, but many do, and the original poster is trying to justify to the compliance-happy parts of an organisation why it's ok to base a company's future on something labelled as ${perceived-to-be-negative adjective}. So, rather than use words that are unclear (people in this conversation seem to have different perspectives on them), I suggest that we use unambiguous language: "branch X will be supported until x/y/zz". Jon -- Jonathan Anderson jonathan@FreeBSD.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"