看板 FB_hackers 關於我們 聯絡資訊
> Technically, the branches are stable fair enough, but remember some people don't know what are FreeBSD branches nor the internal notation or the calling convention. They want to know what can they download to use on their production environments. As well, probable makes sense to have somewhere defined why there are 3 stable, production releases and the life support scheme for each. Sort of: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solaris_%28operating_system%29 (Solaris Release Timeline) > so it'd be: > Releases: 10.0, 9.2, 8.4 > Testing: 11-snapshot, 9.3 Sounds good. I think legacy should be dropped in favour of something simpler and easy to digest from sys admins to data center managers. -- Stefan Parvu <sparvu@systemdatarecorder.org> _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"