on 28/03/2011 21:22 Julien Laffaye said the following:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Garrett Cooper <gcooper@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> III. Package naming that includes architecture, major OS version (for API/ABI),
>>> maybe more.
>>
>> This could be provided in the manifest. Doing it in the filename sort
>> of turns into a mess, as I've discovered working at Cisco :).
>>
>
> Actually, it *is* in the +MANIFEST of pkgng packages archives :-)
Well, by the package name I meant not only a package file name.
Let's imagine that we do support installing i386 packages on amd64 in parallel to
amd64 packages. And for some reason I want to have both 32-bit and 64-bit
versions of, say, firefox; e.g. for benchmarking. If the packages would have the
same name, then that would be impossible.
I think that having some thing in package name in addition to package metadata
could have certain benefits.
--
Andriy Gapon
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"