On 15 April 2011 19:28, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 15 April 2011 18:41, Steven Kreuzer <skreuzer@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> I just ran pearpc through a 8.2 amd64 tinderbox and it bombed out.
>> Looks like whatever is causing it not to compile in 8 has been fixed
>> in 9. We can change the port so thats its only marked as broken if the
>> OS is not >= 9
>>
>
> Looks fine for me too, on 8.2-RELEASE [1].
>
> Erwin, you marked it BROKEN, but I can't find any error logs, and
> portsmon's drawing a blank.... could it have been transient?
>
> I'm running it through a tinderbox now on 7.4 [2].
>
> Chris
>
Mystery solved-- missing dependency on nasm.
I'll run it again and submit a patch.
Chris
[1] http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/tinderlogs/pearpc-f7.4.html
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"