> Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 05:57:05 -0700
> From: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
> Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
>
> I think 4.0.6 is quite stable now. Is it really less stable than the
> current version in ports 3.2.12?
> Why don't you at least put them into ports/emulators repository with
> -devel suffix like many other ports do? So that there is no need to go
> through the third party repository.
4.0.6 is still not as robust for me as 3.2.12, but it's now close and
the added features still make it a win for me. I have not had an actual
crash with 4.0.6, but I have had VMs simply deadlock.
The problems I have seen are all upstream, not FreeBSD specific. I see
the same issues when I use my Ubuntu VM running on Windows7. 4.0.6 is
MUCH more stable than 4.0.4.
I think it's reasonable to update the port.
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"