看板 FB_questions 關於我們 聯絡資訊
On Mon, 07 Jul 2014 18:28:01 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > On Mon, 07 Jul 2014 14:21:04 +0100, Arthur Chance wrote: > > > dd [options] [ infile [ outfile ]] > > This way users by accident could mistake the infile with the outfile. > > We dislike to randomly screw up infile and outfile, so IMO it makes > sense to force if= and of= "operands". Because "man dd" says: The dd utility copies the standard input to the standard output. Those are the "files" being used when no options are provided. To override those defaults, if= and of= have to be supplied. It would be comparable to having a -i and -o option (or like many other programs do when _not_ using the defaults: -f, whereas the default is usually program-specific, e. g. tar's default is /dev/sa0, or $TAPE, if set). Additionally, the form "command infile(s) outfile" is also found in programs like cp or mv (or even ln), which do not require a specific option for defining what is input and what is output. Unlike JCL keyword parameters, we see positional parameters here, which urges us to differentiate OS/JCL from DOS/JCL at the next seizure of nostalgia. ;-) However, dd is one of the few programs that causes touble with traditional autocompleting shells, because '=' is a valid character for use within file names, whereas ' ' (space) is the standard delimiter character. % dd if=/dev/d[TAB] if=/dev/ not found % dd if=/dev/_ More intelligent shells however can deal with this. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"