On Thu, 13 May 2004 08:46:40 -0400
James Stephenson <jstephen@gwds.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 21:00, Jesper Wallin wrote:
>
> > I've checked the configuration file for SpamAssassin, but yet I havn't find any good
> > solution for spam.. Sure, spam will always be a problem and I guess it's impossible to
> > filter 100% of all spam..
>
> Jesper:
[.. about how good dspam is ...]
> It works extremely well, but it takes a while to train. I've had mine
> up for three days now, and it is increasing in accuracy with each day.
> You just have to make sure that you forward all your e-mails to the spam
> alias when you receive them, and all false positives as well, or else it
> will be worthless. Check out the web site, maybe it will help explain
> it a bit more. One note - the documentation is not that good, so set up
> could be a bit of a hassle.
You may want to look in the ports@ archives where a recent discussion
about dspam has taken place.
On nice thing is that recent version of amavis-new can run dspam.
--
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"