How about a password hash? Wouldn=B4t those collisions enable the criation=
of a different password
with the same hash?
--
//| //||
// | // ||
-//--//---|| ARIO LOBO
// // ||
---------------------------------
mario.lobo@ipad.com.br
http://www.ipad.com.br
On 18 Aug 2004 at 14:29, Peter C. Lai wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 09:08:12PM +0300, Claudiu wrote:
> > hello,
> >
> > please explain what do you mean by "reverse the hash". Is this the
> > recreation of the originial message from its hash ?
>
> The short answer is yes. The slightly longer answer is that such is only=
one
> specific case. The general case is that the digest should not reveal any=
> information about the original message.
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.o=
rg"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"