On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, John Hay wrote:
> Well I can accept your argument for -stable, although bigger changes has
> gone in -stable in the past, but what about -current? My -current boxes
> also still claim: "sshd version OpenSSH_2.9 FreeBSD localisations
> 20011202" And this is the problem, if we don't have -current upgraded
> we have little chance in getting wrinkles out and very little chance of
> it going in -stable.
>
> Also maybe we should think again about all our local changes and if all
> of them are really necesary. If we can ditch some, that will also make
> it a lot easier to upgrade.
Funny, my -CURRENT boxes claim:
SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.8.1p1 FreeBSD-20040419
I might check that you're using the version shipped with FreeBSD rather
than a package-installed version, and that your sshd configuration doesn't
include a line to indicate the older version number.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
robert@fledge.watson.org Principal Research Scientist, McAfee Research
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"