On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 03:30:37AM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote:
> Let me just boldly insert that IMHO, if 6.X is going to become stable this
> autumn already that indeed 5.4 or maybe 5.5 at least one of those must be
> long-term-supported. I'm sure one of the two will, as one of the two will
> reflcet ultimately the walk-of-life of 5-STABLE, won't it?
Why don't we just skip 6 and name it "FreeBSD X" or "FreeBSD 10" ?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"