>
> On 2005.09.23 22:55:56 +0100, markzero wrote:
> > With all that has been said so far, what is the actual point of
> > the noexec flag?
> >
> >From mount(8) (yes I like quoting the docs. when we have them ;);) ):
>
> =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0This option is useful for a server that has file =
systems
> =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0containing binaries for architectures other than =
its own.
Sorry Simon and others,=20
Where the least privilege principle gone? If there isn't any necessity to h=
ave=20
normal or suid binaries on a partition, why enable it?
Using it on a data-only partition with a chrooted application does not limi=
t=20
any possible damage? Like file upload and execution using an application=20
security flaw could be stopped at some point.=20
Saying one can easily do privilege escalation (like ppl are saying) doesn't=
=20
eliminate the need of file permissions and other access policies.
Regards,
=2D-aristeu
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"