On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 23:44 -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> ports tree in the process, the end result is a bit more undefined. One
> thing that I wish for is that the ports tree would branch for releases,
> and that those branches would get security updates. I know that this
> would involve an exponentially larger amount of effort from the ports
> team, and I don't fault them for not doing it. Still, it would be nice
> to have.
Yes, totally agree.
That's the way OpenBSD ports tree works and it worked very well for me.
Thus not to say FreeBSD's one didn't, but it takes a lot more attention,
which isn't always a bad thing ;)
--
Massimo.run();
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"