看板 FB_security 關於我們 聯絡資訊
Hello! On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Though I admit RELENG_4 is getting dusty, it is not rusty. I believe it > is still used in many places because of its stability and performance. > > For instance, according to Julian Elischer's posts, it seems he is still > working on it. > > Is it envisageable to extend the RELENG_4's and RELENG_4_11's EoL once > more ? Yes, I'm also voting for it. This support may be limited to remote-exploitable vulnerabilities only, but I'm sure there are many old slow routers for which RELENG_4 -> 6 transition still hurts the performance. RELENG_4 is the last stable pre-SMPng branch, and (see my spring letters, Subject: RELENG_4 -> 5 -> 6: significant performance regression) _very_ significant UP performance loss (which has occured in RELENG_4 -> 5 transition) still isn't reclaimed. So I think it would be wise to extend { RELENG_4 / RELENG_4_11 / both } [may be limited] support. Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"