Not everybody requires LDAP/PAM , so making it part of base is not a
valid reason.
Same can apply for any other 3rd party port (Apache,Samba,etc etc).
On 09/17/2011 05:30 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 09/16/11 23:36, Mike Carlson wrote:
>> On 09/16/2011 08:05 AM, Dag-Erling Sm繪rgrav wrote:
>>> We currently have a number of PAM modules in ports, and while some of
>>> them are specific to certain third-party software, many aren't. I
>>> believe we would benefit from importing at least some of these into
>>> base. My question is: which ones?
>>>
>>> DES
>> LDAP support out of the box would be fantastic.
>>
>> Mike C
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>> "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> Also a strong vote for LDAP support. LDAP is our backend for several
> server systems and it is a kind of pain
> having to think first for the ports to be installed. Also I suspect and
> hope a better integration if LDAP gets
> part of the core system.
>
> Regards,
> Oliver
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"