On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:15:44AM -0800, Xin Li wrote:
> Would you please elaborate how this would be less ugly (e.g. with a
> patch)?
Why doing a patch if you apparently don't care? )
In few words, it less ugly because it 1) will be public API, 2) will
restrict all possibe future dlopen() usage (f.e. someday tar, which used
in some ftpds, can use dlopen() to load its formats etc.)
> We discussed a change like this but IIRC it was rejected because the
> affected surface is too broad and we wanted to limit it to just the
> implicit dlopen()s to avoid breaking legitimate applications.
Instead of total disabling we can (by calling rtld function) restrict
dlopen() in ftpd() to absolute path of know safe directories list like
"/etc" "/lib" "/usr/lib" etc.
--
http://ache.vniz.net/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"