看板 FB_security 關於我們 聯絡資訊
On 6/10/12 8:03 PM, Oliver Pinter wrote: > On 6/11/12, RW<rwmaillists@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:37:30 +0200 >> Oliver Pinter wrote: >> >>> 16 rounds in 2012? It is not to weak?! >> It's hard to say. Remember that blowfish was designed as a cipher not >> a hash. It's designed to be fast, but to still resist known plaintext >> attacks at the beginning of the ciphertext. It was also designed to >> work directly with a passphrase because there was a history of >> programmers abusing DES by using simple ascii passwords as keys. >> >> For these reasons initialization is deliberately expensive, >> effectively it already contains an element of passphrase hashing. > Yes, I know that the blowfish is a cipher and not hash, but I think 16 > round today is too small. I checked this in a freshly installed > openbsd, and they used 256 round ($2a$08$...) . > In OpenBSD, I think the number of Blowfish rounds is configurable via login.conf. I'd think that'd be an easy change to bring over... _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"