On 3. Jul 2012, at 12:39 , Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
> Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>> The correct solution to this problem is to remove BIND from the base
>> altogether, but I have no energy for all the whinging that would =
happen
>> if I tried (again) to do that.
>=20
> I don't think there will be as much whinging as you expect. Times =
have
> changed.
>=20
> I'm willing to import and maintain unbound (BSD-licensed validating,
> recursive, and caching DNS resolver) if you remove BIND.
I'd object to it. Trading one for another without gaining anything does
not help us much.
Don't get me wrong I have both running for years and even maintain =
patches
for unbound for 2 years now for functionality they do not provide, which
named happily gives me.
If you want to do this, I would prefer a properly laid out action plan
as the import is by far the easiest but the integration into various
parts of the system is harder.
/bz
--=20
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"