Re: Recent security announcement and csup/cvsup?

Dear Ollivier and all,
 	I have problem with the portsnap: I maintain a private 
"repository" under the /usr/ports: There is a /usr/ports/tmp where I store 
new ports to be tested, and submitted. The portsnap is removing 
unrecognized local files.
 	With cvsup I don't have such a problem.
 	I have no information about pkgng, whether I can maintain private 
repository with pkgng or not?

Janos Mohacsi
Head of HBONE+ project
Network Engineer, Director Network and Multimedia
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Co-chair of Hungarian IPv6 Forum
Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F  4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882

On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Ollivier Robert wrote:

> According to Gary Palmer on Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 01:04:21PM -0500:
>> In other words: while signed updates via freebsd-update and portsnap
>> are great for a good chunk of users, they don't address everyones needs.
>
> Hopefully, with the move toward kngng, there will be less need of portsnap (and /usr/ports for that matter).
>
> -- 
> Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- [e-mail]
> In memoriam to Ondine, our 2nd child: http://ondine.keltia.net/
>
> _______________________________________________
> [e-mail] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[e-mail]"
>
_______________________________________________
[e-mail] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[e-mail]"