RE: FreeBSD DDoS protection

khatfield@... writes:
> =

> Please read the rest of the thread before criticizing.

Let me clarify.  Na=EFvely blocking ICMP isn't the only thing firewall admi=
ns should avoid doing.  I think that one should construct firewalls in such=
 a manner that for all prohibited classes of traffic, the firewall should r=
eturn the correct destination-unreachable messages (TCP RST or ICMP UNREACH=
ABLE) to the traffic source.  For one, this makes the presence of a firewal=
l less obvious to attackers, but more importantly, end users don't have to =
wait for their connections to mysteriously time out when they do something =
prohibited.  Black holes and null routes have their place, such as in respo=
nse to an active denial of service attack, but not in the primary traffic c=
ontrol policy.

-- =

I FIGHT FOR THE USERS


_______________________________________________
[e-mail] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[e-mail]"