Re: OpenSSL static analysis, was: De Raadt + FBSD + OpenSSH + hole?

Den 23/04/2014 kl. 21.14 skrev Charles Swiger <[e-mail]>:

> The most straightforward changes to this snippet would be either:
> 
> int foo(int y, int z) {
>  int x;
>  if (y == z) {
>      x = 0;
>  } else {
>      x = 1;
>  }
>  return x;
> }
> 
> ...or:
> 
> int foo(int y, int z) {
>  int x = 0;
>  if (y != z) {
>      x = 1;
>  }
>  return x;
> }
> 
> Not only are both of these shorter and they pass clang's static analyzer without a warning, I'd argue that the second version is noticeably cleaner.

I don't disagree with you, but rewriting 1000 if-else cases in single-threaded userland programs just so the analyzer understands them is 1) tedious and 2) bound to accidentally introduce at least 50 new bugs, since most real-life examples are considerably more complicated than the minimal example I posted.

Erik
_______________________________________________
[e-mail] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[e-mail]"