看板 FB_smp 關於我們 聯絡資訊
On 02-Apr-2002 Terry Lambert wrote: > "Andrew R. Reiter" wrote: >> >> I've been looking at some global values that are not associated with any >> one subsystem, but need a lock at some point in order to guarantee correct >> bheavior -- specifically, at the moment, the securelevel value. I do not >> right away see a clean place for the related lock to be initialized... Am >> I missing some SYSINIT() (or SYSINIT()s) that are meant for helping to >> initialize locks in this type of situation while still >> protecting/promoting correct order (to ensure we init prior to a lock >> attempt)? Or is that not a good path to go down? > > Initialized to what non-default setting? > > Initializing a lock as locked is a bad idea. Initializing it as > unlocked is, well, automatic. No it's not. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message