看板 FB_smp 關於我們 聯絡資訊
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 18:01:51 +0900, Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> said: Seigo> On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 01:36:44 -0700, Seigo> Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> said: bright> * Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> [020425 01:19] wrote: >>> >> >>> >> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/socket_milestone1.diff.gz >>> >> bright> Why is there a "sigio" lock in this delta? Seigo> I should have stripped that out, but my patch would result in lock Seigo> order reversal between a socket lock and a process lock. As we Seigo> protect p_fd by a process lock, we have to lock it prior to locking a Seigo> file descriptor or a socket. Seigo> I suppose I have to commit the stripped patch of a sigio lock first. The patch of a sigio lock is not stripped out at: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/sigio.diff.gz -- Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <tanimura@FreeBSD.org> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message