On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 18:01:51 +0900,
Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> said:
Seigo> On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 01:36:44 -0700,
Seigo> Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> said:
bright> * Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> [020425 01:19] wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/socket_milestone1.diff.gz
>>> >>
bright> Why is there a "sigio" lock in this delta?
Seigo> I should have stripped that out, but my patch would result in lock
Seigo> order reversal between a socket lock and a process lock. As we
Seigo> protect p_fd by a process lock, we have to lock it prior to locking a
Seigo> file descriptor or a socket.
Seigo> I suppose I have to commit the stripped patch of a sigio lock first.
The patch of a sigio lock is not stripped out at:
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/sigio.diff.gz
--
Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <tanimura@FreeBSD.org>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message