On 12-Jun-2004 John Polstra wrote:
> [Why does a caller to cv_signal(9) have to hold the associated mutex?]
Never mind. I understand now. It allows the implementation to
avoid doing any locking internally. That seems perfectly
reasonable, and I withdraw my question.
John
_______________________________________________
freebsd-smp@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-smp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"