看板 FB_smp 關於我們 聯絡資訊
Well more specifically, I was just wondering if it is a wise idea to turn o= n=20 HyperThreading (i.e. will I see any benefit performance wise)?=20 PS. I know about the security issue regarding HT already. On 8/1/05, Dylan Goss <acct@dylangoss.com> wrote: >=20 > I have a dual core, dual processor IBM xSeries 345 that is running at > 2.8GHz. I'm not sure if that is the chip, here's part of the dmesg: >=20 > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2793.90-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin =3D "GenuineIntel" Id =3D 0xf29 Stepping =3D 9 >=20 > Features=3D0xbfebfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PG= E > ,MCA,C > MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs > real memory =3D 3221069824 (3071 MB) > avail memory =3D 3150704640 (3004 MB) > ACPI APIC Table: <IBM SERONYXP> > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs > cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 > cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 > cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 6 > cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 7 >=20 > It is running 5.4 release w/SMP enabled and doing well. I can't > really expand much unless I know what you're looking for, let me know > if I can help. >=20 > Best, > d. >=20 > On Aug 1, 2005, at 6:39 PM, Indigo 23 wrote: >=20 > > Anyone have any experiences with FreeBSD running on an Intel > > Pentium D 820 > > [Dual Core 2.8GHz]? > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-smp@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-smp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >=20 > _______________________________________________ freebsd-smp@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-smp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"