On Friday 01 December 2006 20:43, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> [061201 11:30] wrote:
> > Have you looked at the usb work that Hans Petter Selasky
> > at http://www.turbocat.net/~hselasky/usb4bsd yet?
>
> I just did, while it solves a lock order problem, this doesn't
> appear to solve the programmitic issues, namely multiple usb IOs
> requiring callbacks and how to issue a series of complex usb
> IOs from interrupt context.
>
> Basically, I need to be able to do USB IO as if I was doing normal
> BUS IO, usb does not offer this in interrupt context except as a
> series of callbacks that appear to be programmatically impossible
> to implement.
Yes, yes, this is supported. See the USBD_USE_POLLING flag.
>
> Have a look at if_aue.c, then look at any of the error cases that
> might be called from interrupt context, they wind up doing sync IO
> to the device which is illegal (sleeping while holding a driver
> lock).
>
> Hans Petter Selasky's work is nice, however it doesn't solve
> these issues, the lock would still have to be held.
You don't want to do things without holding a lock.
> Do you understand that I'm trying to give usb ethernet the
> same ease of programming that other devices on a "fast bus"
> have?
Yes, but that comes at an expense. Higher CPU usage, more delay.
--HPS
_______________________________________________
freebsd-smp@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-smp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"