--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 01:05:53AM -0500, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2007, at 12:41 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>=20
> >On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
> >
> >>What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT =20
> >>tree with
> >>4BSD or ULE ? How do those stand up against the Linux SMP =20
> >>scheduler for
> >>scalability. It would be nice to see the comparison displayed to =20
> >>see what
> >>the performance improvements of the aforementioned patch were =20
> >>realized to.
> >>This would likely be a nice graphics for the SMPng project page, =20
> >>BTW...
> >
> >There are graphs of this on Jeff's blog, referenced in that URL.
> >Fixing filedesc locking makes a HUGE difference.
>=20
> Kris,
>=20
> This is fantastic news! Is there an approximate date for when all of =20
> these patches are going to hit CVS?
Hopefully within a week or two. It might not be that exact patch, I
think John wants to try and do it a bit differently instead of
introducing a new locking primitive just for this.
Kris
--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFF4SgEWry0BWjoQKURAorkAJ42xCwaSaaBP4BpoRf6gWmJ1HMxsgCeI6uH
hj9/ZDlMxdlVeW+3ry/seJE=
=Uks7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g--