Hello
I'm in the process of purchasing a new server. I'm currently looking =20
at two Supermicro based options, one with a Core 2 Duo Q6600 Quadcore =20=
2.4GHz 2x4MB (on a PDSMi+ board) , and another with two Xeon 5110 =20
dualcore 1.6GHz 4MB (on a X7DVL-i board).
Both configurations would have 4GB (2x2Gb) memory (to begin with, 4 =20
slots on the boards so max 8GB), and I'm thinking about 4x 500GB =20
disks in a raid10 config on a 3Ware 9550SX.
What my question is, from the performance point of view, what would =20
be best? Two dualcores or a single quadcore? I'm thinking about =20
memory bandwidth and such... Bus bandwitdh (to ethernet and disks)...
Looking from the upgrade point of view I guess two dualcores can be =20
replaced with two quadcores, but on the other hand, if that will be =20
necessary then another box is probably a better solution...
Is there any known problems with FreeBSD and these stuff? =46rom what =20=
I've understood Supermicro is pretty FreeBSD-friendly and should work =20=
fine...
The box will be used mainly with a jail running MySQL and Apache 2, =20
and a number of other jails which will take fare less power... So =20
mainly mysql & apache.
If someone have any clues about which system performs best, or any =20
other input, everything is appreciated!
Thanks
--
Johan Str=F6m
Stromnet
johan@stromnet.se
http://www.stromnet.se/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-smp@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-smp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"