Re: [PATCH] Adaptive spinning for lockmgr

2009/6/14 Kris Kennaway <[e-mail]>:
> Attilio Rao wrote:
>>
>> This patch enables adaptive spinning for lockmgr:
>> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/adaptive_lockmgr.diff
>>
>> and it should presumably improve performance on disks/vfs/buffer cache
>> based benchmarks, so, if you want to try out and report any benchmarks
>> result, I'd love to see it.
>> Please note that there are some parameters to tune: for example, you
>> would like to not enable adaptive spinning to default while you just
>> want that for a class of locks (and in that case you want to apply the
>> reversed logic for what is living now) or you want to use different
>> values =C2=A0for retries and loops. Interested developers can refer to s=
uch
>> 3 variables.
>> Peter Holm alredy tested that patch for about 24hours without any
>> regression to report.
>>
>> Also note that the patch is not 100% yet as long as it needs UPDATES
>> and manpages updates, but they will be added just in time before to
>> commit.
>> The modify is all there.
>
> I have a vague memory that we had tested a version of this in the past an=
d
> found that it caused a performance loss in common cases? =C2=A0Many lockm=
gr
> callers are not amenable to adaptive spinning because they have to wait o=
n
> slow I/O. =C2=A0Testing only with e.g. md backing might give results that=
 are
> non-representative.

I don't think I ever implemented adaptive spinning in lockmgr so if
somebody else did I don't know. Said that, probabilly the best
approach would be to disable it by default ad use a LK_ADAPTIVESPIN
flag on a per instance basis.
Such conditions, though, need to be explored a bit and I have no time
to dedicate to this right now.

Thanks,
Attilio


--=20
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
_______________________________________________
[e-mail] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[e-mail]"