看板 FB_stable 關於我們 聯絡資訊
On 4 May 2010, at 21:38, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:27:23PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: >> 2010/5/4 Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>: >>> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 06:35:52PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: >>>> Good news ! It worked, check the picture here : >>>>=20 >>>> http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/4244/dsc00361g.jpg
>>>=20 >>> Please try adding code fragment like this: >>> if (cx_next->p_lvlx =3D=3D NULL) >>> printf("Going to panic.\n"); >>> to dev/acpi/acpi_cpu.c:acpi_cpu_idle() function, right before >>> CPU_GET_REG(cx_next->p_lvlx, 1); >>> line and see if it prints the message immediately before the panic. >>>=20 >>=20 >> Yes it does at the beginning of the kernel panic. >=20 > Ok, so the point of panic is found, it is NULL cx_next->p_lvlx = resource. > With the data in hand, I recommend you to ask on acpi@ (added a Cc:) > about the cause and possible solution. I don't remember the details, but I've seen this before. Does your CPU = Cx levels change when you plug/unplug the AC adapter? Regards, -- Rui Paulo _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"