On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 07:26:45PM +0900, Yoshiaki Kasahara wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 02:54:44 -0700,
> Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> said:
>
> > I realise you're talking about amd64, but I'm not sure how UMA is
> > getting enabled on i386 to begin with. It does look like it's enabled
> > on amd64 by default.
>
> I believe that this thread had been started before this tunable was
> introduced on May 24th. Before that, ZIO_USE_UMA was used to control
> the use of UMA, and it was enabled unconditionally in
> /usr/src/sys/modules/zfs.
Yoshiaki, thanks for the tip. I didn't check CVS commit logs to see
when this tunable was introduced. It appears that the systems I'm
looking at don't have the use_uma tunable because the kernel was built
from RELENG_8 code dated May 23rd. This would also explain why Pete
sees the tunable and I don't.
Wish this stuff was documented somewhere. :-)
--
| Jeremy Chadwick jdc@parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"