Re: hast vs ggate+gmirror sychrnoisation speed

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:55:34 +0100 Pete French wrote:

 >> You could change the values and recompile hastd :-). It would be interesting
 >> to know about the results of your experiment (if you do).

 PF> I changed the buffer sizes to the same as I was using for ggate, but the speed
 PF> is still the same - 44meg/second (about half of what the link can do)

You can check if the queue size is an issue monitoring with netstat Recv-Q and
Send-Q for hastd connections during the test. Running something like below:

while sleep 1; do netstat -na |grep '\.8457.*ESTAB'; done

Also tcpdump may help :-)

-- 
Mikolaj Golub
_______________________________________________
[e-mail] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[e-mail]"